🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working abroad. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.